|
 |
|
|
|
Los Angeles Times "House Narrowly OKs Statehood Vote in Puerto Rico Enfranchisement: Bill passes 209-208, but Senate unlikely to consider it this year. Islanders themselves are sharply divided on commonwealth's status." MARC LACEY TIMES STAFF WRITER (03/05/98, Copyright 1998 / The Times Mirror Company) WASHINGTON -- One hundred years after Puerto Rico was seized by the United States, the House, by the narrowest of margins, voted Wednesday night to allow the Caribbean island to choose to become the 51st state, remain a commonwealth or split off as an independent nation. The bill passed 209-208, with the one-vote margin illustrating the complexity of an issue that has divided Puerto Ricans for decades and left many members of Congress in both parties scratching their head about the implications of a state of Puerto Rico. Even with the House's approval of a plebiscite among Puerto Ricans, the status of the Spanish-speaking island, annexed during the Spanish-American War, remains as unsettled as ever. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) has indicated it is unlikely the Senate will consider similar legislation this year, a sentiment probably enhanced by the closeness of the House vote. And Puerto Ricans themselves, proud of both their heritage and their ties to the United States, are intensely divided on the best course for their homeland. In 1993, residents of the densely populated island just 1,000 miles southeast of Miami indicated by a narrow margin that they preferred to remain a U.S. commonwealth. In the nonbinding vote, commonwealth status won 48% of the vote, statehood was backed by 46.2% and independence won support from just 4.4%. That difference of opinion was obvious Wednesday, with the four members of the House that are of Puerto Rican descent split on the legislation. Romero-Barcelo and Rep. Jose E. Serrano (D-N.Y.) favored the plebiscite, while Reps. Luis V. Gutierrez (D-Ill.) and Nydia M. Velazquez (D-N.Y.) argued that Puerto Ricans already had spoken in favor of remaining a commonwealth. The House bill, which was endorsed by the White House, calls for an island-wide vote by the end of this year. Then, based on the results, Congress and the president would set up a process for either statehood or independence in coming years. If commonwealth status were to win, Puerto Ricans would continue to vote on the issue every decade. The cost of the balloting would be paid for in a uniquely Caribbean way--through taxes on rum. "Finally, this has become a national issue," said Democrat Carlos Romero-Barcelo, the island's nonvoting delegate in the House and a statehood advocate. "The more the people of this nation look at this, they will see it not as a Puerto Rican problem but an American problem. How can we have 3.8 million disenfranchised Americans?" House Republican leaders have pushed Puerto Rican statehood as part of an effort to reach out to Latino voters. Several polls have found that many Latinos feel alienated from the GOP, an attitude stemming in part from California's passage of Proposition 187 in 1994. That initiative, which cut government service to illegal immigrants, was spearheaded by Republican Gov. Pete Wilson. Among other controversial GOP-backed measures in recent years was a 1996 bill to make English the official language of the United States, which passed in the House but was never taken up by the Senate. Republicans backed off on that concept during Wednesday's debate. With hundreds of Puerto Ricans following the proceedings from the visitors' gallery, lawmakers rejected a contentious amendment offered by Rep. Gerald B.H. Solomon (R-N.Y.) that would have declared English the official language in Puerto Rico and the rest of the country--even though just a quarter of Puerto Ricans are fluent in English. House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) called that proposal "a slap in the face of the people of Puerto Rico." As a bipartisan alternative, lawmakers agreed that it is "in the best interest of the nation for Puerto Rico to promote the teaching of English" and that the island ought to teach English-language proficiency to students by the age of 10. Puerto Rico, which has 3.8 million residents, has been a U.S. territory since 1898. Congress voted citizenship for Puerto Ricans in 1917. In 1952, it became a commonwealth, an in-between status. Along with having no voting representatives in Congress, Puerto Ricans--despite their citizenship status--cannot vote in presidential elections. "I am the sole representative to this House for the 3.8 million U.S. citizens of Puerto Rico and I cannot vote," said Romero-Barcelo. "This is defining legislation for my constituents . . . and yet, I cannot vote. This legislation would end 100 years of Puerto Rico's colonial relationship with the nation, yet I cannot vote." Debate steered clear of the many economic implications of statehood. As much as 40% of the island's economy is based on a special exemption that allows U.S. manufacturers to avoid paying any federal tax on profits there. As a state, it could lose that exemption. Federal payments to the state of Puerto Rico, where the majority of residents receive some form of government assistance, likely would increase substantially. But residents, who have a per-capita income of just $7,662 a year, would also be forced to pay federal income tax, from which they are now exempt. [PHOTO: Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez (D-Ill.) at news conference in which Congress was urged to reject statehood for Puerto Rico. In 1993, Puerto Ricans voted by a narrow margin in favor of remaining a commonwealth.; PHOTOGRAPHER: Associated Press]
|
