Vol. 3 No. 6

Para ver este documento en español, oprima aquí.

PUERTO RICO VOTE NOT SO PUZZLING AFTER ALL: THORNBURGH

PLEBISCITE RESULTS MAY POINT TO THE FUTURE

SAN JUAN: VACATIONER'S PARADISE -- With the exactness of a finger snap, San Juan's weather takes a turn for the better in mid- December, as the rainy season disappears into the dry, bright afternoons of winter. There's a clear light in San Juan at this time of year. It enhances the blues of water and sky along San Juan's beaches, which stretch from Condado all the way out to undeveloped Piñones, and turns iridescent in Old San Juan as it bounces from the sandstone facades of historic fortresses and chapels, and splashes across the pastel sides of old houses...

Puerto Rico Vote Not So Puzzling After All

As U.S. Attorney General under Presidents Reagan and Bush, I urged Congress to sponsor a democratic process to resolve the status of Puerto Rico based on constitutional principles which favor equal rights and responsibilities for all citizens, as well as government by consent of the governed. Even though these basic values governed our nation's process for resolving the status of 33 other large and populous territories since 1789, in 1998 Congress again failed to take long overdue action on Puerto Rico's status.

Yet, instead of asking why Congress still has no plan to end Puerto Rico's current state of political limbo, many pundits reacting to a recent status vote held under local law in Puerto Rico seem puzzled because statehood supporters in the territory have not abandoned their cause after failing to win a majority.

(I)nstead of being puzzled because elected statehood leaders in Puerto Rico are asking Congress to act on the basis of the recent plebiscite, let's remember that America became the greatest nation in the history of the world by empowering people with the tools for informed self-determination. Sooner or later Congress will have to do the same for Puerto Rico, and the sooner the better for Puerto Rico and the nation as a whole. -Dick Thornburgh

"QUOTABLES"

"English-only' Betrays Xenophobia

AUSTIN, Texas -- "With statehood , we will not become blue-eyed blondes.Neither will it snow in Puerto Rico. We will remain as we are ... speaking Spanish, eating fritters."

This text, from a commercial on Puerto Rican television in September of 1998, was designed to reassure residents of the commonwealth that statehood would not mean the end of Puerto Rican culture. Ironically, similar ads could prove necessary in the U.S. to convince a paranoid majority that the country's growing number of Spanish-speaking citizens will not result in economic and cultural chaos.

The movement to legislate English as the official U.S. language is completely unnecessary and, at worst, inflammatory. Americans shouldn't forget that this country has always been a nation of immigrants who eventually learn English; legislating an official language would only betray the xenophobia of a dwindling majority.

English will likely remain the widespread de facto language of choice because of its utility as a unifier. No legislation is needed to create this condition. Alarmists who politicize the issue merely betray another unfortunate trend in American history: a rather inexplicable fear of outsiders. -Brian Winter, Daily Texan (U. Texas-Austin)


The Land that Would be a State: Divided over Statehood, Puerto Rico's Economy Shows It's Practically Joined Up

San Juan - While Puerto Ricans remain split over whether they want to become a U.S. state, their island's speedy recovery from Hurricane Georges shows a paradox: When it comes to the economy, Puerto Rico is practically a state already.

Integration into the U.S. system -- including the use of the U.S. dollar, U.S. interest rates and U.S. bond markets -- helps keep Puerto Rico 's economy humming along with 3 percent annual growth, while many nations in Latin America and the Caribbean now struggle to grow at all.

Long term, Rossello and others in his pro- statehood party dream of a day when Puerto Rico would not just resemble a state economically --but actually be the 51st star on the U.S. flag.

"Statehood is a development tool," claimed economic czar Vivoni. "It's not just because we'd get more federal funds. It's for the perception of stability that comes with being a state. Statehood would mean even more business and investment." - Doreen Hemlock, SUN-SENTINEL

Time to Prepare for Young Status Hearings

"I see statehood and separate sovereignty as acceptable alternatives for Congress," the Alaska Republican, whose state entered the Union in 1959, said. "Because 'None of the Above' received the majority vote, I intend to conduct oversight hearings to see what led people to cast votes against the only constitutional options available to Puerto Rico which were on the ballot," he added. -CARIBBEAN BUSINESS

STATEHOOD ISSUE IS CAUGHT IN STALEMATE - PUERTO RICO AND CONGRESS ARE WAITING FOR THE OTHER TO DEFINE THE POLITICAL RELATIONSHIP

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico - The people of Puerto Rico are divided. Congress won't take a stand. How can Puerto Rico resolve its decades- old debate over political status with the United States?

The stalemate costs time, energy and money in San Juan and Washington, with no end in sight for a political relationship that many describe as the world's biggest colony or an island in limbo. -OSCEOLA SENTINEL

THANKS TO THE PDP, PUERTO RICO'S FREE LUNCH WILL SOON BE OVER

Make no mistake about it, the prospect of federal taxation for Puerto Rico's elite, not the voter's preference for the status quo tipped the scales against an outright statehood triumph on December 13th. Paying little or no taxes under the porous Hacienda collection apparatus, the wealthy five percent among us feared the efficiency of the Internal Revenue Service more than they fancied commonwealth. -Miriam Ramirez de Ferrer

EXPERT SAYS CONGRESS HAS POWER TO TAX PUERTO RICO

"Congress has full powers to tax the US territories and there is nothing special under commonwealth relationship to stop it. Taxation without representation is just a slogan. There is nothing in the Constitution about it," said John Killian. -Robert Friedman, THE SAN JUAN STAR

RELATED WEBSITES:

www.pnp.org
www.puertoricousa.com
www.puertorico51.org
www.prstatehood.com


ANOTHER VIEW
`NONE OF THE ABOVE': DECEMBER VOTE NOT ISLANDS AWAY FOR NATIVES OF PUERTO RICO

The full meaning of the election is still being sorted out, but because of the (Puerto Rican Cultural Society of Dayton Symposium on Puerto Rico status) I have a better perspective on why voters said `None of the Above.'

Why? None of the choices offered on December's ballot represented improvements on the status quo. Arguments seemed to be rooted in the past - often appearing stale by the lack of relevance to the world we live in. Today we have increased globalization of not only trade but also of ideas and how and where we live. State boundaries are becoming less distinct as national and international ties grow more dominant. One speaker questioned if the U.S. Congress would accept Puerto Rico only if Puerto Ricans looked and acted more like mainlanders. But the truth is, demographics hint that the mainland may be growing to look more like Puerto Rico , which includes a mix of cultures, many based on Hispanic heritage.

Going in, I thought I would have picked statehood. But that choice wasn't as clear-cut as it appeared. Limitations had been imposed by Congress. And more troubling, pro- statehood Gov. Rossello had spent more time building consensus in Washington than in San Juan.

Imposing statehood by political maneuvering might have worked in the19th century, as happened in Ohio. But today's voters in Puerto Rico are sophisticated. It's essential to first build consensus at home before Puerto Rico can move ahead. -Kay Semion, DAYTON DAILY NEWS

De Hostos' Political Thinking Distorted

The best tribute we could render De Hostos today is to achieve what he sought 100 years ago and was ignored by Puerto Rican political sectors at the time. That is, set aside personal ambitions, grudges, bitterness, calumnies, vicious personal attacks, distortion of facts, lies, and unfounded fear and false nationalism, which flooded our political scenario during the campaign leading to the December 13, 1998 status consultation. Instead, let's keep in mind De Hostos' legacy to think intelligently so as to achieve among us the unity and harmony in an embrace of reconciliation so we could reach a consensus among us to ask the 106 U.S. Congress this year to approve legislation establishing a process under which we, in the exercise of our right to self-determination, can vote in a status referendum for viable, legitimate and realistic decolonization status options... But what cannot be included as a decolonization option is our present status (which is the problem) and a free association option like the one included in the December 13 status consultation, which was bound to be unacceptable to the U.S. Congress... By the same token, the plebiscite cannot include as an option the announced new definition of the commonwealth status which is the best of two worlds, already rejected by the U.S. Congress. -Guillermo Moscoso

The Misguided Drive for Engish-Only Laws

Arizona voters narrowly approved one sweeping initiative that barred Arizona state workers from using any language other than English while on the job or while performing official duties.

The Arizona Supreme Court declared that the law violates constitutional free-speech and equal-protection rights. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court let stand that state court ruling without comment.

What else was left to say?

English's dominance as the world's premier language for trade, finance and political discourse won't be damaged one iota. And the United States will be ever stronger for such freedom. -Myriam Marquez, ORLANDO SENTINEL

Implications of the Puerto Rico Political Status Plebiscite

Congressional Sponsored Plebiscite Necessary

Both the 1993 and 1998 plebiscites were conducted under local law after Congress failed to approve federal plebiscite legislation defining the available choices to achieve a permanent status.

The 1998 plebiscite confirms the need for Congress to ascertain the will of the people of Puerto Rico among options Congress is willing to consider. This can be accomplished only if Congress sponsors a referendum under Federal law and informs the voters of the terms for continuing the current status or changing to a new status.

The Statehood Movement
100 Years of Evolution

For Barbosa, "Americanization" was not incompatible with island patriotism, but rather it was the vital instrument by which to obtain social justice and economic progress. For him, political unity with the United States did not imply dissolving the cultural personality of the Puerto Rican people. Political assimilation was not synonymous with cultural assimilation. He was convinced that Calderón's native tongue could coexist with that of Shakespeare, thus creating a more educated and dynamic people. -Gonzalo F. Cordova

Write your Member of Congress in Support of Puerto Rico Self-Determination!

House of Rep. Member Web Sites

Senate Member Web Sites

 

Write Your Representative

Write your Senator

Under Statehood All Puerto Ricans
Would Have Been

American Taxpayers
Have Forked Over



Wealthier Today, and
Commonwealth is Costing Them
$6,000.00 More Every Year!
Subsidizing Puerto Rico Commonwealth, and It's Costing Them $22,821,918.52 More Each and Every Day of the Year!


PUERTO RICO SELF-DETERMINATION
Puerto Ricans Earning Their Own Way
Puerto Rico Paying Its Own Way

Self-Determination Legislation | Puerto Rico Herald Home
Newsstand | Puerto Rico | U.S. Government | Archives
Search | Mailing List | Contact Us | Feedback